PTOtherInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025

Effect of Pharmacological Treatment on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and Allergic Inflammatory Response in Endurance Athletes.

Ronaldo Aparecido da Silva, Renata Nakata Teixeira, Gerson Dos Santos Leite and 5 others

PMID 40756803

WHAT IT FOUND

In 13 treated elite male endurance athletes, 30 days of individualized respiratory medication reduced exercise-induced bronchoconstriction; 92.3% no longer showed EIB after a breathing challenge.

Peak oxygen uptake and running speed improved, but allergic inflammatory markers did not change.

Key findings

01After treatment, 92.3% of athletes in the treated group no longer showed exercise-induced bronchoconstriction after the breathing challenge, and only one remained positive (100% vs. 7.7%, p<0.001).

02In the treated group, FEV1 improved compared with baseline at 3 to 15 minutes after the challenge.

03Treated athletes had increased speed and peak VO2 compared with baseline and control, while T helper cell subtypes did not differ.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 13 athletes received treatment, so the result is based on a small group. Of 103 invited, 31 were included, and 9 were excluded, so the sample may not represent the wider athlete population. Athletes were not blinded, and treatment was assigned by test response rather than random allocation. Follow-up was only 30 days, so durability and possible medication tolerance were not assessed. Exercise testing was done in a laboratory, not during competition. All participants were elite male endurance athletes, so findings may not apply to women or non-elite athletes. Medication was stepped by severity, so the contribution of corticosteroid, long-acting beta-agonist, short-acting beta-agonist, and montelukast cannot be separated.

Declared interests

The only reported declaration is funding from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that 30 days of treatment works for all endurance athletes or reduces allergic inflammation; only 13 treated athletes were studied, and no allergic inflammatory response measures changed.

Read it on PubMed →