OTRCTOccupational therapy international2022

Effect of Multivoice Chorus on Interpersonal Communication Disorder.

Huiling Lei

PMID 35854942

WHAT IT FOUND

College students with interpersonal barriers who joined a multivoice chorus reported significant improvements in anxiety, depression, and social sensitivity compared to those receiving counseling alone.

However, this paper is retracted, so these findings should not influence clinical practice.

Key findings

01The experimental group receiving chorus plus counseling showed statistically significant improvements in interpersonal sensitivity, paranoia, and other mental health factors compared to the control group.

02Two weeks after the intervention, the benefits in the chorus group remained significant, whereas the control group's improvements were unstable and faded.

03Participants reported high satisfaction with the chorus activities, noting increased interaction and a more harmonious group atmosphere.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The paper is a retracted publication, meaning the data or conclusions have been withdrawn by the publisher and are not reliable. The study population was limited to college students, so results may not generalize to other age groups or clinical populations. The control group received no intervention, making it impossible to distinguish the specific effect of chorus from the non-specific effects of group attention or time spent with others. The intervention combined music, counseling, and group discussion, so the contribution of the chorus element alone cannot be separated.

Declared interests

No specific funding sources or conflicts of interest are declared in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not implement this chorus protocol based on these results. The paper is retracted, which typically indicates serious errors or misconduct, so the reported positive effects on interpersonal communication and mental health are not valid evidence.

Read it on PubMed →