Effect of implementing an anesthesia nurse checklist in a safety and teamwork climate: quasi-experimental study.
Cassiane de Santana Lemos, Vanessa de Brito Poveda
PMID 36122360WHAT IT FOUND
Nurses using a new anesthesia checklist felt more confident in their team’s safety and cooperation.
Anesthesiologists’ views on management improved, but their perception of nurses' performance remained lower than nurses' own views.
Key findings
01The total safety climate score for staff increased by an average of 4.12 points after the checklist was introduced.
02The total teamwork climate score increased by approximately 60.09 points, with significant gains in team participation and task orientation.
03Anesthesiologists reported lower scores for professional performance than nurses did, suggesting they perceive nurses as more affected by fatigue and workload.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study lacked a control group and randomization, making it difficult to attribute changes solely to the checklist. Data was collected from a single private hospital in Brazil, limiting generalizability to other healthcare settings. The six-month intervention period may be too short to capture long-term changes in safety culture, as adherence to new standards often takes longer to stabilize. The participants were staff members, not patients, so the outcomes reflect perceptions of safety rather than actual clinical adverse events or patient outcomes.
Declared interests
The study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the USP School of Nursing. No specific funding sources or commercial conflicts of interest are explicitly declared in the provided text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not interpret the improved survey scores as evidence that the checklist reduced actual patient adverse events or mortality. The study measured staff perceptions of safety and teamwork, not clinical outcomes, and the lack of a control group means other factors could have influenced these perceptions.