Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
Kirsten C Wagener, Matthias Vormann, Matthias Latzel and 1 others
PMID 30322342WHAT IT FOUND
Directional hearing aid microphones plus remote microphone were better than omnidirectional microphones plus remote microphone for lab speech understanding in complex tests in 15 experienced hearing aid users, especially when switching between near and far talkers.
Performance was also better after remote microphone use.
Key findings
01In the dual-task test, directional hearing aid microphones plus remote microphone gave better combined speech intelligibility than omnidirectional microphones plus remote microphone.
02In the interleaved test, where talkers alternated between near and far, directional microphones plus remote microphone gave higher speech intelligibility than omnidirectional microphones plus remote microphone.
03Speech intelligibility was higher in the second visit than in the first, and this was significant for far-field speech in the interleaved test.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 15 listeners completed the main study, and 5 of 20 invited listeners were excluded after screening. The participants were adults aged 63 to 83 years with severe hearing loss and more than 9 years of hearing aid experience, so results may not apply to children or people with less hearing aid experience. The tests were done in a sound-treated room with loudspeakers and recorded restaurant noise, not in a real classroom or family gathering. The study did not report the condition without remote microphone, so it cannot show how much the remote microphone itself helped. The authors could not separate the effect of remote microphone acclimatization from additional practice on the tasks because there was no test-retest without acclimatization. Some secondary task results may have reached a ceiling, which can hide visit effects. The article text does not give the percentage intelligibility results for the main comparisons, so the size of benefit cannot be judged directly.
Declared interests
The named funder was Sonova AG, Stäfa, Switzerland.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that directional hearing aid microphones with a remote microphone will improve everyday listening for all patients with hearing loss. This was a small laboratory study in 15 experienced hearing aid users, and the condition without remote microphone was not reported.