OTRNQualitativeJournal of clinical nursing2025

Eating Together but Often Feeling Lonely: Residents' Mealtime Experiences in a Nursing Home.

Magdalena Nielsen, Carina Werkander Harstäde, Anna Sandgren

PMID 39568155

WHAT IT FOUND

Residents said familiar, tasty, easy-to-chew food mattered most.

Stable routines and staff who knew their preferences made mealtimes calmer. Many felt lonely, found it hard to talk with incompatible companions, and sometimes ate in apartments.

Key findings

01Residents said taste and variety made meals positive, but hard-to-chew food, food hardened in transport, and supper that felt like lunch led some to leave food unfinished, skip supper, or eat in their apartments.

02Stable seating and predictable meal times felt secure; delays to food service frustrated residents. Staff who knew preferences and made service smooth mattered, while staff talking among themselves could feel disruptive.

03Many residents felt lonely or incompatible with dining companions, and some avoided staying in the dining area after unpleasant incidents, although they often accepted this.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study was done in one Swedish nursing home, and residents were mostly native Swedish, so it may not fit more diverse homes. Twenty residents were interviewed, and experiences varied between individuals, so the themes describe possibilities, not a pattern that applies to all residents. Some residents had dementia and interviews were more like conversations, with less detail from some participants. One interview was not recorded and relied on notes. The study asked about experiences; it did not measure food intake, weight, malnutrition, loneliness scores, or whether any change improved these. Staff and management were not interviewed, so the paper cannot show why routines or staffing changed.

Declared interests

The supplied metadata lists non-U.S. government research support. No author conflict-of-interest or funding declaration appears in the article text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read these themes as proof that changing food texture, routines, or staff behaviour will improve intake or loneliness. The study asked 20 residents at one Swedish nursing home what they experienced; it did not test an intervention.

Read it on PubMed →