PTRCTClinical rehabilitation2026

Does radial shockwave therapy lead to immediate improvements in pain in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A randomised controlled trial.

B Alsulaimani, L Perraton, J Bourke and 2 others

PMID 41308020

WHAT IT FOUND

With identical exercise and education, radial shockwave did not lower calf raise or hop pain more than sham across three sessions in insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Both groups had small before-after improvements, so any immediate benefit was not attributable to shockwave.

Key findings

01Radial shockwave was not better than sham for immediate change in pain during a standard calf raise or hop test across the three sessions.

02Radial shockwave was not better than sham for immediate pain tolerance to pressure at the affected Achilles, unaffected Achilles, or elbow.

03Small pre-to-post reductions in loading-test pain occurred after sessions 1 and 2, and small pre-to-post increases in pain tolerance to pressure occurred at all sites, but these changes were not greater with radial shockwave than sham.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The trial was done at one private physiotherapy clinic and recruited mainly through social media and clinical networks, so it may not represent patients who are digitally isolated or not connected to those networks. The sham device was not truly inert; it was a machine held to the skin with no pressure, so the comparison is not a completely inactive placebo. The physiotherapists giving the treatment knew which group patients were in, although they used a script to reduce bias. The study did not measure other treatments participants may have used alongside the trial interventions. Some participants missed sessions: three in the sham group did not attend the second and third sessions, and one in the radial shockwave group did not attend the third. It only looked at immediate changes after each of three sessions, not longer-term outcomes.

Declared interests

The trial was funded by DJO Global, a company that sells shockwave therapy machines. The authors disclosed receipt of financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of the article.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the small before-after pain reduction as evidence radial shockwave works. Both groups also received exercise and education, and the primary outcome showed no difference between radial shockwave and sham.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →