Does family-centred education improve treatment adherence, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood glucose level in patients with type 1 diabetes? A randomized clinical trial.
Mahsa Mansour, Naser Parizad, Masumeh Hemmati Maslakpak
PMID 36550064WHAT IT FOUND
Adding family-centred education, checklists and follow-up to routine diabetes education improved adherence versus routine education alone in 60 patients with type 1 diabetes.
HbA1c improved; fasting glucose did not differ.
Key findings
01Treatment adherence improved when family-centred education, checklists and follow-up were added to routine education: the intervention group mean score changed from 139.27 to 170.80, the control group changed from 139.27 to 136.37, and the post-intervention between-group difference was significant (p < 0.001).
02HbA1C decreased when family-centred education, checklists and follow-up were added to routine education: the intervention group mean changed from 9.23 to 7.43, the control group changed from 9.00 to 8.97, and the post-intervention between-group difference was significant (p < 0.001).
03Fasting blood glucose decreased within the intervention group from 205.17 to 169.43 (p < 0.001), but the between-group difference after education was not significant (p = 0.26).
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Patients were selected by convenience sampling from one diabetes association in a small region of Iran, so results may not apply to other settings. Treatment adherence was measured with a self-report questionnaire, which can be subjective. The follow-up was short; the authors caution that laboratory improvements need long-term rechecking. The education level of active family members was not considered, although it may affect learning. Possible confounders such as personality, culture, economic situation and motivation could still affect learning.
Declared interests
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency. The authors declare no competing interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that family-centred education alone significantly reduced fasting glucose compared with routine care. The between-group difference after education was not significant (p = 0.26), and the intervention group also received routine education, care checklists, and follow-up contact, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated.