RNSystematic ReviewWestern journal of nursing research2025

Do Nursing Patient Classification Systems to Classify Inpatients Impact Outcomes? A Scoping Review.

Ilaria Artuso, Roberta Da Rin Della Mora, Nicoletta Dasso and 6 others

PMID 41045199

WHAT IT FOUND

Only four small, non-experimental studies have assessed outcomes of nursing patient classification systems.

In one discharge study, a researcher using an NPCS reported 149 care areas versus 82 by nurses without it. Evidence is too thin to change care.

Key findings

01Only four studies were included, none experimental, and they were published between 1998 and 2015.

02In a discharge-planning study, nurses without an NPCS identified 82 care areas among 25 patients, while a researcher using an NPCS identified 149 among the same patients; nurses using an NPCS identified 115 in another 25-patient sample.

03The outcomes mapped were limited to adult patients and provider perceptions or satisfaction; no included study assessed caregivers, pediatric patients or organizational outcomes.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Only 4 studies were included, and all were small, non-experimental and published between 1998 and 2015. The studies used different NPCSs, different hospital units and different timing of classification, so the results cannot be combined into a single effect. No quality appraisal of the included studies was performed. Outcomes were mostly satisfaction, perceptions or counts of care areas, not objective clinical outcomes such as safety, complications or discharge results. No included study assessed caregivers, pediatric patients or organizational outcomes. The review was limited to languages known by the team, so relevant studies in other languages may have been missed. Stakeholder consultation involved only authors of NPCS papers; none of the 5 authors who responded had studied the impact of their system.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (5x1000 project 2017 5M-2017-23684151).

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that nursing patient classification systems improve patient care. The review found only four small, non-experimental studies, and the reported gains were care-area counts or satisfaction perceptions, not objective clinical outcomes. In some studies the NPCS was introduced alongside education or quality-improvement changes, so its effect cannot be separated.

Read it on PubMed →