Development and validation of a method to screen for co-morbid depression by non-behavioral health practitioners treating musculoskeletal pain.
Leonard N Matheson, Joe Verna, Dawne Saunders-Enright and 3 others
PMID 32955474WHAT IT FOUND
In outpatient physical therapy, a 22-item mood screen flagged 35 of 156 patients.
Flagged patients reported worse pain and lower task ability. Lower mood-screen scores were linked to better return-to-work.
Key findings
01Using a score of 9 or higher on the 22-item mood screen, 35 of 156 participants were identified as experiencing depressive illness.
02Participants identified as depressed had higher baseline pain scores (5.22 of 10) and lower task-ability scores (103.18 of 200) than non-depressed participants (4.27 and 133.61).
03Participants who moved from not working to working had lower baseline mood-screen scores than those whose work status stayed the same or worsened.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The sample was a convenience sample from three stand-alone outpatient physical therapy clinics in Southern California, so patients who seek this care may differ from patients in hospital, surgical, or multidisciplinary settings. The study is observational, so it cannot show that depression causes worse pain, lower function, or poor return to work. The 9/22 cut-point was likely too high because no false positives were identified, meaning some people with depressive symptoms may have been below the trigger. The screening information was not formally integrated into the physical therapy plan of care, other than making staff more aware of motivation and catastrophizing. Follow-up timing varied from 32 to 260 days after the third visit, and work status came from telephone questions about working before and now.
Declared interests
The Vert Mooney Research Foundation funded the study and owns the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile. Leonard Matheson and Joe Verna benefit financially from MTAP sales and subscriptions, John Mayer received compensation for contributing, and Matheson, Mayer, and Verna are board members of the funding foundation.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that using this screen will improve return to work. The study did not test the screening process as an intervention; it reported links between scores and outcomes. The authors also say the score of 9 or higher was likely too high.