RNCohortNursing & health sciences2026

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Experience of Living With Chronic Heart Failure-University of Navarra Scale.

Maddi Olano-Lizarraga, Maribel Saracíbar-Razquin, Amparo Zaragoza-Salcedo and 16 others

PMID 41482758

WHAT IT FOUND

A Spanish 30-item questionnaire for outpatient heart failure care was found usable for assessing profound change, acceptance, normality, hope, and family impact; the death subscale was removed.

Key findings

01The revised Experience CHF-UNAV Scale has 30 items in five subscales: profound changes, acceptance, normality, hope, and family impact; the death subscale was removed.

02Among 299 participants, the original 53-item scale had no missing data and total-score test-retest stability of 0.72.

03The abbreviated scale showed consistent scores within subscales (Cronbach's alpha 0.73 to 0.87) and stable scores after 7 to 10 days (intraclass correlations above 0.70).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample was Spanish-speaking outpatient heart failure patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV disease, so the scale may not be valid for class I, inpatients, or other languages. Only 37% were women, which may limit how well women's experiences are represented. The death subscale was removed because it fit poorly in this sample, whose mean age was 69.34 years, so thoughts about death may be underrepresented. Several items showed age or education bias, so differences by age should be interpreted cautiously. Direct scores are not linear, so change scores may be hard to calculate; linear scores are recommended for research. No existing scale measures the same construct, so validation relied on correlations with quality-of-life questionnaires rather than a direct comparator.

Declared interests

Funded by public agencies (Plan Estatal de I+D+I 2013 to 2016, Carlos III Health Institute, and European Regional Development Fund); the funder did not intervene in design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing, or submission. Authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as proof that the scale improves heart failure care. It validates a Spanish questionnaire for outpatients with moderate to severe disease, and the death subscale was removed because it did not fit this sample.

Read it on PubMed →