Developing and Sustaining Recovery-Orientation in Mental Health Practice: Experiences of Occupational Therapists.
Alexandra Nugent, Nicola Hancock, Anne Honey
PMID 29097969WHAT IT FOUND
Australian occupational therapists described recovery-oriented mental health practice as ongoing work.
They sought knowledge, found fit with occupational therapy identity, maintained hope, strengthened clinical reasoning, and tried to shape supportive teams and workplaces.
Key findings
01Participants described developing and sustaining recovery-oriented practice as an active, ongoing journey, not a static decision.
02Therapists sustained recovery-orientation by seeking knowledge, finding fit with professional identity, maintaining hope, and strengthening clinical reasoning for positive risk.
03Coworker attitudes, leaders, peer workers, restrictive settings, and time limits influenced therapists' ability to sustain recovery-oriented practice.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Findings are qualitative and not universally applicable. All participants worked in New South Wales or Victoria, Australia, so health-system differences may limit transfer. Participants were recruited only if they already identified as recovery-oriented, so the study may not explain why others do not adopt the approach. Participants' experiences varied with training, experience, practice context, and role. The supplied text does not state the number of participants, making sample size hard to judge.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that recovery-oriented practice improves patient outcomes. It reports therapists' experiences and strategies, not measured recovery effects.