Narrative ReviewEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2024

Designing studies and reviews to produce informative, trustworthy evidence about complex interventions in rehabilitation: a narrative review and commentary.

William M Levack, Douglas P Gross, Rachelle A Martin, Susanna Every-Palmer, Carlotte Kiekens, Claudio Cordani, Stefano Negrini

PMID 38922317

WHAT IT FOUND

This paper is a methodological commentary, not a clinical trial.

It discusses how to design research for complex rehabilitation interventions but provides no evidence on whether specific treatments work for patients.

What this paper is

This is a narrative review and commentary discussing the theoretical frameworks and methodological challenges of researching complex rehabilitation interventions. It outlines definitions of complexity, describes the MRC-NIHR framework, and presents case examples of how research designs have been applied, but it does not report original patient data, conduct a meta-analysis, or test a clinical intervention. Consequently, there are no direct findings on treatment efficacy or safety to change clinical practice.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    William M Levack, Douglas P Gross, Rachelle A Martin, et al. Designing studies and reviews to produce informative, trustworthy evidence about complex interventions in rehabilitation: a narrative review and commentary. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2024.

    Read the original