Delayed Admission to the Intensive Care Unit Is Associated With Increased Mortality Risk in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Shivaprasad Anagi, Diane Chamberlain, Nigel Barr and 6 others
PMID 41825944WHAT IT FOUND
SOFA score differences between delayed and non-delayed ICU admissions were not significant.
Delayed admission was associated with higher mortality risk, particularly among patients with higher SOFA scores.
Key findings
01Delayed ICU admission was common: 276 of 403 patients (68.5%) waited more than 5 hours, with a median delay of 7.13 hours.
02The SOFA score comparison between delayed and non-delayed groups was not statistically significant at 24 hours, 48 hours, mean or highest scores.
03Higher SOFA scores were independently associated with higher odds of mortality: each one-point increase in highest SOFA score raised odds by 7.5%, and each one-unit increase in 24-hour SOFA score raised odds of adverse outcomes including mortality by 6.8%.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Single-centre design at one regional hospital, so results may not apply where ICU capacity, staffing or transfer processes differ. Delay was defined as more than 5 hours using an Australian policy plus a 1-hour operational buffer, and different thresholds may change the findings. SOFA scores were measured only after ICU admission, so the study cannot tell whether higher scores in delayed patients reflected deterioration during the delay or baseline illness severity. Observational design means residual confounding is possible; diagnosis type and illness severity at ED presentation were not fully adjusted for. The study was powered to detect moderate SOFA differences, and the paper states that about 538 patients would be needed to detect a small effect, so null SOFA comparisons may reflect limited power. Follow-up was limited to the hospital stay, and total follow-up time was not collected. Long-term morbidity or quality of life after discharge were not measured. Types and causes of ICU admission delay were not distinguished. Reliance on one hospital's routine and paper data could introduce site-specific measurement or recording differences.
Declared interests
Funding was from Queensland Health's Clinical Research Fellowship Novice Researcher grant (Rural, Regional and Remote category-2024).
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the 7.5% and 6.8% odds increases as the effect of ICU admission delay itself. Those figures are for each one-point increase in highest SOFA score and each one-unit increase in 24-hour SOFA score, and the SOFA score differences between delayed and non-delayed groups were not statistically significant.