Declines Noted in Cognitive Processes and Association With Achievement Among Children With Leukemia.
Kathleen C Insel, Marilyn J Hockenberry, Lynette L Harris and 6 others
PMID 28632246WHAT IT FOUND
Children with leukemia declined in verbal working memory during treatment, especially if diagnosed before age 5.
Girls also declined more on visual matching. A combined working memory score could hide this because the visual-spatial part did not decline.
Key findings
01Number Letter scores declined over three measurement occasions, and children diagnosed younger than 5 years had a greater negative slope than children diagnosed at 5 years or older.
02In the subgroup tested for achievement, the slope for change in verbal working memory was significantly associated with Letter-Word Identification and Calculation scores.
03Females showed a greater decline in visual matching, while treatment risk group did not predict cognitive change over time.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Age-adjusted scores account for expected development, but the study cannot separate treatment effects from school absence, isolation, stress, or other factors. The children received protocol-based cancer treatment with different medications by protocol, so the study cannot attribute decline to one specific drug or component. Risk comparisons were limited because only 4 children were low risk and 2 were very high risk, so these groups were pooled with standard and high risk. Achievement correlations were based on smaller subgroups (43 children for visual matching and 29 for WRAML2), and missing data were assumed to be missing at random. The cognitive battery required English fluency, so results may not apply to children who needed an interpreter. The WRAML2 composite could mask opposite changes because Number Letter declined while Finger Windows did not show a negative slope. The authors note that practice effects or feeling better could affect retest performance, and the study did not test causal mechanisms for decline.
Declared interests
The paper is listed as supported by NIH extramural research funding. The supplied text does not report author conflicts of interest or whether the sponsor designed or wrote the study.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that cancer treatment caused the cognitive decline. The children received protocol-based treatment, not a single tested intervention, and the study observed change over time without showing a cause. The authors also state that decline does not suggest impairment.