SLPRNSystematic ReviewJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2022

Decision Aid Interventions for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Dementia in Decision-Making About Feeding Options: A Scoping Review.

Yaolin Pei, Xiang Qi, Dena Schulman-Green and 3 others

PMID 36150408

WHAT IT FOUND

Decision aids for families choosing feeding options in advanced dementia improved caregiver knowledge and reduced decisional conflict.

They did not clearly change tube feeding preferences or actual tube feeding use.

Key findings

01All 3 intervention studies reported significant postintervention increases in knowledge about tube feeding and reductions in decisional conflict.

02Effects on caregivers' preference for tube feeding and actual use of tube feeding were limited; after 9 months, tube feeding was rare and not significantly different between groups.

03The decision aid content was similar across studies and included dementia information, principles of surrogate decision making, and advantages and disadvantages of tube feeding and hand feeding.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review did not judge whether the included studies were methodologically strong. Only 6 publications representing 4 unique interventions were found, so the evidence base is small. The search was limited to English articles published from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022, and not every database was searched, so relevant studies may have been missed. Most studies used short or unstructured exposure to printed or audiovisual materials, so it is unclear how much caregiver engagement was needed. Effects on tube feeding preference and actual use were limited and inconsistent, so the aids cannot be treated as interventions that change feeding choices. Cultural adaptations were mostly surface level, such as lower reading level and updated evidence, and did not systematically address deeper cultural values or mistrust. The review focused on feeding options, but families often face multiple related end-of-life decisions.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that decision aids reduce tube feeding use or change family preferences. The review found better knowledge and lower decisional conflict, but effects on preference and actual tube feeding were limited, and tube feeding was rare and not significantly different after 9 months.

Read it on PubMed →