RNPilotNursing open2021

Daily garden use and quality of life in persons with advanced dementia living in a nursing home: A feasibility study.

Melanie van der Velde-van Buuringen, Wilco P Achterberg, Monique A A Caljouw

PMID 33348453

WHAT IT FOUND

Residents were outside on only 25.4% of possible intervention days.

During the intervention, positive affect rose and social isolation decreased; neuropsychiatric symptoms did not change significantly. Feasibility depended on staffing and routines.

Key findings

01Participants went outside on 25.4% of possible intervention days, with ward rates from 12.5% to 56.3%.

02Positive affect rose from 7.80 to 8.90 and social isolation decreased during the intervention, while total neuropsychiatric symptoms showed no significant difference.

03Caregivers were ambivalent about feasibility: some moved usual care outside, while understaffing and workload made it difficult.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The analysed sample was 20 participants, after 4 of the 24 selected participants could not take part. Only one nursing home was studied, and it was chosen because staff were trained in person-centred care and it had a suitable garden. The study compared the same participants over time, not against a separate control group. Participants went outside on only 25.4% of possible intervention days, with ward rates from 12.5% to 56.3%, so the intervention was not delivered as planned. The number of days outside during baseline was not measured, so the true difference between usual care and the intervention period is unknown. The intervention took place during the summer holiday season, when many caregivers were on vacation and workload was high. Follow-up instructions were unclear, so the negative affect change between intervention and follow-up cannot be interpreted. Quality of life and neuropsychiatric symptoms were rated by caregivers after observation, so the results depend on caregiver perception.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that garden use alone is an effective treatment. Participants also received usual care, caregiver contact, relatives, volunteers and activities outside, and the study cannot separate the contribution of any one component; neuropsychiatric symptoms did not change significantly.

Read it on PubMed →