CyberLimb: a novel robotic prosthesis concept with shared and intuitive control.
Nicolas Seppich, Nicholas Tacca, Kuo-Yi Chao and 6 others
PMID 35488186WHAT IT FOUND
One trans-radial amputee pilot used a heavy CyberLimb prototype with a jaw-clench headband, smartphone, backpack and wrist auto-leveling.
She preferred the headband over EMG control, but the system was too heavy for daily use.
Key findings
01In training, the pilot found EMG control fatiguing after 22 hours and preferred the FSR headband, which required less physical and cognitive effort to operate.
02In the Cybathlon competition, the pilot completed the Clean Sweep and Stacking Cups tasks, but did not complete Breakfast, Home Improvement, or Haptic Box because of time constraints and a haptic sensor failure.
03CyberLimb weighed 1.95 kg, almost twice the pilot's daily prosthesis at 1.03 kg, and the paper states the system was far too heavy for daily tasks.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The evaluation involved a single trans-radial amputee pilot, so it describes one person's experience and cannot establish effectiveness for other amputees. CyberLimb was a prototype, not market-ready, and the paper states it was far too heavy for daily tasks. The device weighed 1.95 kg, almost twice the pilot's daily prosthesis at 1.03 kg, and its width prevented completion of the laundry task. It was built for Cybathlon tasks, including a notch for competition scissors, so it may not generalize to everyday objects or activities. EMG control was abandoned after 22 hours of training, and the headband was used instead, so the comparison with EMG is not a controlled test. The haptic object classifier was trained on 300 grasps, and a sensor failure prevented completion of the Haptic Box task in competition. The headband, smartphone interface, backpack, wrist auto-leveling, manual forearm rotation, and training were used together, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The cost comparison was uncertain because the pilot's daily prosthesis price was not revealed and CyberLimb had no certification or clinician evaluation costs.
Declared interests
Funding was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Lighthouse Initiative Geriatronics by LongLeif GaPa gGmbH, and Technische Universität München (1025).
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that CyberLimb is an effective daily prosthesis or that the headband control will work for other amputees. It was tested in a single pilot during Cybathlon training and competition, and the paper reports that the device was too heavy for daily tasks and that some tasks failed because of time constraints and sensor failure.