OtherAutism : the international journal of research and practice2023

Cutting our own keys: New possibilities of neurodivergent storying in research.

Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Monique Botha, Kristien Hens, Sarinah O'Donoghue, Amy Pearson, Anna Stenning

PMID 36259512

WHAT IT FOUND

This article is a theoretical essay about neurodivergent researchers reclaiming their own narratives in academia.

It contains no clinical findings or patient outcomes, so it offers no evidence to change how you assess or treat patients.

What this paper is

This is a theoretical and autoethnographical essay discussing the challenges neurodivergent researchers face in academia and proposing new methods for collaborative storytelling. It reports no clinical outcomes, patient data, or intervention results, so there is nothing here to change your practice on.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the authors' personal experiences or proposed research methodologies as evidence that a specific clinical intervention works or fails. This is a philosophical discussion about academic culture and identity, not a study of patient outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Monique Botha, Kristien Hens, et al. Cutting our own keys: New possibilities of neurodivergent storying in research. Autism : the international journal of research and practice. 2023.

    Read the original