RNOtherInternational journal of nursing studies2021

Cross-cultural assessment of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory: A psychometric evaluation.

Maddalena De Maria, Maria Matarese, Anna Strömberg and 7 others

PMID 31791631

WHAT IT FOUND

The Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory showed comparable scale scores across Italian, Swedish and US patients with chronic illness.

Some items did not behave the same, so read item scores cautiously.

Key findings

01The maintenance, monitoring, and management scales all reached partial scalar invariance.

02The strictest equivalence level was not reached for any scale.

03The management item about taking medicine to reduce symptoms fit better with autonomous behavior than consulting behavior across countries.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only Italy, Sweden and the US, so it does not show that the inventory works in other countries. The design was cross-sectional, so it says nothing about how self-care changes over time. Italy and the US used convenience samples, while only the Swedish sample was consecutive, so the samples may not represent all patients. Patients with dementia, severe illiteracy or inability to read the survey language were excluded, so results may not apply to those patients. Strict invariance was not reached, so individual item scores may not mean the same thing in each country. Because the countries differed in both culture and language, the study could not separate the effects of culture and language. Most participants were older adults with multiple chronic conditions, so findings may not apply to younger adults or people with fewer chronic conditions.

Declared interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the SC-CII is equally valid for every item, every country or every patient. The study tested only Italy, Sweden and the US, used convenience samples in Italy and the US, and did not reach the strictest level of equivalence, so some items may be interpreted differently.

Read it on PubMed →