Critical factors for the return-to-work process among people with affective disorders: Voices from two vocational approaches.
Susann Porter, Annika Lexén, Suzanne Johanson and 1 others
PMID 29843300WHAT IT FOUND
People with depression or bipolar disorder who were unemployed said a dedicated employment specialist helped them feel believed in and more hopeful about work.
Traditional step-by-step services felt fragmented, impersonal, and discouraging.
Key findings
01Participants experienced prejudice and fear about disclosing mental health problems at work, and many reported negative outcomes after disclosure.
02IES participants said the Employment Specialist supported them, respected them, helped with disclosure decisions, and made them more hopeful about returning to work.
03TVR participants described traditional services as fragmented, impersonal and inadequate, and three said their depression became worse or they had experienced relapse due to the negative outlook.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 16 of 31 invited participants took part, and 15 did not answer or gave other reasons, so the sample may not represent all people with affective disorders. The study reports experiences, not measured employment or symptom outcomes. IES participants had prior TVR experience and compared the two approaches, while TVR participants had no IES experience, so the comparison is not balanced. The findings are from Sweden and depend on local welfare agencies, so they may not transfer to other systems.
Declared interests
The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read participants' positive experiences of IES as evidence that it improves return-to-work outcomes. This was a qualitative interview study, not a test of effectiveness.