Creating Space for Adolescents and Families With Lived Experience of Homelessness to Build Familial Empathy, Communication, and Emotional Regulation: A Qualitative Study of Facilitators of Implementation.
Dawn T Bounds, Sarah M Rodrigues, Donna Balsam and 3 others
PMID 37379121WHAT IT FOUND
Adolescents and caregivers described a nonjudgmental space where they said they could take each other's perspective, talk more calmly, use time apart instead of yelling, and step back before reacting.
These are participants' reports, not evidence the programme works.
Key findings
01Participants described a safe, nonjudgmental space that persisted beyond the intervention.
02Participants described communication themes of self-reflection, opening up, a systematic approach, and less yelling.
03Participants described emotional regulation themes of stepping back, self-awareness, and ownership, and linked stepping back to an alternative to running away or being kicked out.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The interview sample was small: 11 of 14 invited participants were interviewed, from seven dyads, so the findings may not apply to other families. Interviews happened 12 to 17 months after the intervention, so participants were recalling experiences from 12 to 17 months earlier. The paper reports participants' experiences and implementation facilitators, not measured impact on risk factors. Quantitative findings were to be reported elsewhere. Recruitment was halted by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the sample was limited to interested participants from minoritized backgrounds in a Midwestern setting. Participants who completed follow-up interviews may have been more likely to report positive experiences, though the authors used an interviewer not involved in initial intervention.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that STRIVE+ works. The study analysed participants' descriptions from 11 interviews, not measured impact on risk factors, and quantitative findings were to be reported elsewhere.