PTOtherBrazilian journal of physical therapy2017

Could peak oxygen uptake be estimated from proposed equations based on the six-minute walk test in chronic heart failure subjects?

Giane A Ribeiro-Samora, Dayane Montemezzo, Danielle A G Pereira and 3 others

PMID 28460707

WHAT IT FOUND

Walking-distance equations did not accurately estimate maximal oxygen use in 36 adults with chronic heart failure.

Three underestimated by 15-51%; the fourth averaged close but individual errors were too wide to predict a patient's true capacity.

Key findings

01Equations 2 to 4 underestimated peak oxygen uptake by 15-51% and did not match the measured value.

02Equation 1's average estimate was close, but the error increased as measured peak oxygen uptake rose.

03Measured peak oxygen uptake and six-minute walk distance differed by New York Heart Association class.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only 36 stable adults aged 25 to 59 years with a body mass index under 30 kg/m2, so it may not apply to older, obese, or less stable patients. New York Heart Association class IV patients were excluded, even though the paper says they are the group that would benefit most from an evaluation such as the six-minute walk test. The sample was mostly men, with 29 men and 7 women, so the results may not reflect women with chronic heart failure. The patients had higher left ventricular ejection fraction, measured peak oxygen uptake, and walking distance than the samples used to create equations 1 to 3, which may make those equations less applicable to this group. The number of participants was small for comparing two measurements, and the study could not draw separate conclusions for each New York Heart Association class. One equation was developed in patients with cardiopulmonary disease rather than chronic heart failure specifically.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read equation 1's close average as proof it works for individual patients. The spread of individual errors was large, and the error increased as measured peak oxygen uptake rose.

Read it on PubMed →