OtherNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2024

Control intervention design for preclinical and clinical trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Kathryn S Hayward, Emily J Dalton, Jessica Barth, Marian Brady, Leora R Cherney, Leonid Churilov, Andrew N Clarkson, Jesse Dawson, Sean P Dukelow, Peter Feys, Maree Hackett, Steve R Zeiler, Catherine E Lang

PMID 37837348

WHAT IT FOUND

No clinical outcomes are reported.

This paper does not change patient care.

What this paper is

This is a consensus statement and decision-support tool about how to choose control interventions for stroke rehabilitation trials. It reports no patients, treatments compared in a trial, or clinical outcomes, so there is nothing here to change your practice on.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that any control intervention improves stroke recovery. It is a consensus guide for designing trials, not a clinical outcome study.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Kathryn S Hayward, Emily J Dalton, Jessica Barth, et al. Control intervention design for preclinical and clinical trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2024.

    Read the original