SLPOtherCoDAS2024

Content validity of the Profiles of Early Expressive Phonological Skills-Brazilian Portuguese (PEEPS-BP) - Expanded List.

Simone Nicolini de Simoni, Denis Altieri de Oliveira Morares, Karina Carlesso Pagliarin and 1 others

PMID 38324878

WHAT IT FOUND

The PEEPS-BP Expanded List now contains 29 stimulus words for assessing vocabulary and phonology in Brazilian Portuguese children aged 24 to 36 months.

Experts and mothers selected words familiar to this age group, and children confirmed the corresponding toys were recognizable.

Key findings

01The final PEEPS-BP Expanded List comprises 29 stimulus words validated for children aged 24 to 36 months.

02Content validity was established through four steps involving expert judges, non-expert judges (mothers), child judges, and a pilot study.

03Words were selected based on high agreement between experts and mothers regarding familiarity and whether the word could be represented by a toy.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study validates content only; it does not provide normative data or criteria for clinical diagnosis. The sample sizes for child judges (4) and the pilot study (6) were very small and selected for convenience. The final list of 29 words is shorter than the original PEEPS-US Expanded List (over 20 words) and may have limited sensitivity for detecting subtle phonological deficits. The study was conducted in Brazil, so its applicability to other Portuguese-speaking populations or contexts may require further validation.

Declared interests

No specific funding sources or conflicts of interest were declared in the provided text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not use this instrument for standardised scoring or diagnosis. It has only undergone content validation, meaning experts agreed the words are relevant. It lacks normative data, so you cannot determine if a child's score is typical or atypical compared to peers.

Read it on PubMed →