SLPOtherCoDAS2026

Content validation of the Adapted Cycles Intervention Program (PROCICLOS-A) for children with Speech Sound Disorder - Activities.

Carolina Kuntz Ayub, Haydée Fiszbein Wertzner

PMID 41670120

WHAT IT FOUND

Expert judges rated PROCICLOS-A activities appropriate for children with speech sound disorder.

This checks content only; it does not show the activities improve speech.

Key findings

01Twenty speech-language-hearing expert judges completed the activities validation form.

02For all activities, the 'I totally agree' response ranged from 70% to 100%.

03The overall agreement among the 20 expert judges on the activities was reported as moderate.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

Participants were expert judges, not children, and the paper reports no child outcomes. The study reports content validation, not efficacy or effectiveness outcomes. The overall agreement was classified as moderate by the paper, and some activities lowered the agreement index. The paper's conclusion describes the agreement as good, although the reported AC1 value is classified as moderate. Judges were speech-language-hearing pathologists with master's or doctoral-level experience in phonological SSD, so the ratings may not reflect all clinicians.

Declared interests

The study was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP). The supplied text does not report author conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that PROCICLOS-A improves children's speech. This paper reports expert agreement that activities are appropriate, not child outcomes. It mentions implementation and efficacy studies underway or parallel, but it does not report their results.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →