RNRCTJournal of gerontological nursing2023

Connecting Dementia Caregivers to Recommended Services: Care to Plan.

Joseph E Gaugler, Ashley N Millenbah, Christine J Jensen and 3 others

PMID 37768582

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding a web-based needs assessment to routine phone support did not improve dementia caregiver outcomes at 3 or 6 months.

Caregivers found the tool easy to use but cited time constraints and cost as barriers to acting on its recommendations.

Key findings

01There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in caregiver outcomes over 3 or 6 months.

02Caregivers reported that competing demands and lack of financial capacity prevented them from using the resources recommended by the tool.

03The presence of a senior care navigator in both groups may have overshadowed any specific benefit of the assessment tool.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The sample size was small (43 caregivers), which limits the ability to detect modest effects. Attrition was 25.6% at 6 months, and dropouts were younger than those who remained, which may bias the results. The control group received active telephone support from navigators, making it difficult to isolate the effect of the digital tool itself. The follow-up period was short (6 months), which may not capture long-term changes in caregiver behavior or well-being.

Declared interests

The authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that the Care to Plan tool is ineffective in all contexts. The study compared the tool added to active navigator support versus navigator support alone, so the lack of difference may reflect the strength of the human support rather than a failure of the digital tool itself.

Read it on PubMed →