OTOtherWork (Reading, Mass.)2018

Concordance of assessments of clients' mental and behavioral health with in vivo assessment of work performance.

E Sally Rogers, Uma Chandrika Millner, Diane Brandt and 5 others

PMID 30223409

WHAT IT FOUND

Clients' self-reported mental and behavioral health did not track providers' observed work performance ratings.

Providers' ratings of clients' mental health did track their work performance ratings moderately. Provider and client mental health ratings did not line up.

Key findings

01Participants' self-report of mental and behavioral health had no statistically significant correlation with employment providers' ratings of work performance.

02Employment providers' ratings of clients' mental and behavioral health were moderately correlated with their ratings of client work performance, with one exception.

03Provider ratings and participant self-report ratings on the mental and behavioral health subscales showed non-significant agreement.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only 42 clients from two programs in one state, so it may not represent other regions or larger groups. About 50% of participants had schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, so findings may not apply to other diagnoses. Many participants were in simulated work rather than competitive employment, and the small sample could not fully compare these groups. Work performance ratings were relatively high, which may mean the scale missed differences at the top end. Providers were trained but most were not licensed clinical professionals, and their mental health ratings did not agree with clients' self-report. The study measured associations at one time point, so it cannot show that mental health status causes or predicts work performance. The paper states 42 clients were recruited but does not report how many participants were analysed or how dropouts were handled.

Declared interests

The authors reported no conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the failure of client self-report to track provider work ratings as proof that mental health does not affect work. The study only compared one short self-report measure with provider-observed work ratings in 42 clients, and it cannot show why the scores did not agree.

Read it on PubMed →