Comparison of the performance of different nutritional indicators for predicting poststroke depression in older adults with ischemic stroke.
Shoudi Hu, Maofeng Gao, Yu He and 1 others
PMID 39156681WHAT IT FOUND
Blood albumin, nutritional risk index and short nutrition assessment alone did not predict poststroke depression in older adults with ischemic stroke.
Used together, they identified risk better than any single marker.
Key findings
01Of 239 older adults with ischemic stroke, 78 had poststroke depression when assessed on the seventh day of hospitalization.
02Albumin, GNRI and MNA-SF alone had areas under the ROC curve of 0.371, 0.394 and 0.294, and the paper reported they were not able to predict PSD.
03When albumin, GNRI and MNA-SF were combined, the paper reported an area under the ROC curve of 0.738, sensitivity of 75.6% and specificity of 60.9% for predicting PSD.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study was done at a tertiary hospital in Shenzhen, so results may not apply to other settings. Only 239 patients were analysed, and the authors describe the sample as small. Depression was assessed only on the seventh hospital day, so later PSD after discharge was not measured. Nutritional indicators were measured only at admission, so the direction of association between malnutrition and PSD is uncertain. Most patients had mild neurological impairment; only 7.5% had NIHSS scores greater than five. The individual nutritional indicators did not predict PSD well, and the combined prediction was not externally validated.
Declared interests
Funded by the School of Nursing, Anhui Medical University; the funder had no role in design, data collection, analysis, writing or submission. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that albumin, GNRI or MNA-SF alone can screen patients reliably; the paper reported that these individual indicators were not able to predict PSD. The combined result also comes from a single hospital cohort with short follow-up and no external validation.