PTRNSurveyPain management nursing : official journal of the American Society of Pain Management Nurses2026

Comorbid Conditions of Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes and Vulvodynia: A Latent Class Analysis.

Jennifer E Glayzer, Bethany C Bray, William H Kobak and 5 others

PMID 41966935

WHAT IT FOUND

Among 1,016 females with Ehlers-Danlos or hypermobility, those with both pain and non-musculoskeletal comorbidities were most likely to screen positive for vulvodynia (73%); the pain condition class was 64%.

Screening is not diagnosis.

Key findings

01Participants in the Numerous Multifaceted Comorbidities class (19.8%) had the highest likelihood of screening positive for vulvodynia (73%), significantly higher than the Other Pain Conditions class (p = .02).

02The Other Pain Conditions class (26.5%) had a 64% likelihood of screening positive for vulvodynia, significantly higher than the Non-musculoskeletal Comorbidities class (50%) (p = .005).

03The Few Comorbidities class (18.5%) had the lowest likelihood of screening positive for vulvodynia (39%).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study used an online survey, so participants' Ehlers-Danlos or hypermobility spectrum disorder diagnoses were self-reported and not confirmed by medical evaluation. Vulvodynia was screened with four questions, not diagnosed by pelvic exam, so screening positive is not a clinical diagnosis. The survey was cross-sectional, so it cannot show whether comorbid conditions came before or after vulvodynia symptoms. The sample was predominantly White (92.4%), so findings may not apply to people with Ehlers-Danlos or hypermobility spectrum disorders from other racial or ethnic backgrounds. The comorbid condition checklist was not exhaustive, and participants may have forgotten or not reported conditions. The vulvodynia screening tool may have weaknesses because some participants in the Other Pain Conditions class endorsed conditions that are often ruled out when diagnosing vulvodynia. Mast cell activation disorder was mistakenly listed as medium-acyl-CoA dehydrogenase on the checklist, so that indicator required expert reinterpretation. The analysis describes classes and screening likelihoods; it does not test whether any treatment reduces vulvodynia.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the 73% likelihood as a diagnosis of vulvodynia or proof that treatment works. Participants were screened, not diagnosed, and the cross-sectional survey cannot show that comorbidities caused vulvodynia.

Read it on PubMed →