Narrative ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Common Bias and Challenges in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Research: How to Tackle Them.

Aurore Thibaut, Charlotte Beaudart, Géraldine Martens, Stephen Bornheim, Jean-François Kaux

PMID 36189055

WHAT IT FOUND

This paper reviews methodological challenges in rehabilitation research, such as blinding difficulties and patient heterogeneity.

It offers guidance for researchers designing future trials but reports no original patient data or clinical outcomes, so it does not change current practice.

What this paper is

This is a narrative review discussing common methodological biases and challenges in physical and rehabilitation medicine research, such as blinding difficulties, population heterogeneity, and recruitment issues. It describes study designs and offers recommendations for researchers on how to structure future trials. It reports no original patient data, no outcomes, and no clinical findings, so there is nothing here to change your practice on.

The easy way to misread this

Do not treat the recommendations in this paper as evidence for or against specific clinical interventions. The text discusses how to design better research studies, not which treatments work for patients.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Aurore Thibaut, Charlotte Beaudart, Géraldine Martens, et al. Common Bias and Challenges in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Research: How to Tackle Them. Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences. 2022.

    Read the original