PTOtherFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

Characterizing the Mechanical Stiffness of Passive-Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Struts.

Kara R Ashcraft, Alena M Grabowski

PMID 36188980

WHAT IT FOUND

IDEO ankle-foot orthosis strut categories were not evenly spaced in stiffness.

Categories 1 through 5 differed in forward bending, but categories 2 and 3 did not differ in backward bending. The category number alone does not show the exact stiffness.

Key findings

01When the strut was deflected forward, categories 1 through 5 had average stiffness values of 1.01, 1.47, 1.72, 2.23, and 2.35 kN·m/rad, and each category differed significantly from the others.

02When the strut was deflected backward, categories 1 through 5 had average stiffness values of 0.84, 1.43, 1.57, 2.01, and 2.76 kN·m/rad, but categories 2 and 3 did not differ significantly.

03The stiffness increase between adjacent categories was not the same magnitude in either direction.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This was a bench test of struts only, not a whole orthosis on a person, so it does not show how the footplate, tibial cuff, or user biomechanics would change stiffness during running. Only two struts from each stiffness category were tested, so the values may not represent every strut made. The backward bending test reached only 0.09 rad (5°), which may not cover the full range of motion available during running. The struts came from one manufacturer, so the values may not apply to other passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthosis struts. No people with lower limb impairment were tested, so the study does not show pain, comfort, injury risk, or running performance.

Declared interests

The work was supported by a grant from the Defense for Health Affairs, Clinical Research Intramural Initiative, CDMRPL-17-0-DMI170709, and the funder is named as the U.S. Department of Defense. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the stiffness categories as a simple ladder that predicts ankle control during running. The measured increments between categories were uneven, categories 2 and 3 did not differ when pushed backward, and no people were tested.

Read it on PubMed →