PTOTCohortJournal of physical therapy science2025

Characteristics of physical function and body composition among community-dwelling older females with and without locomotive syndrome.

Takayoshi Saito, Minami Sato, Akira Kubo

PMID 41036520

WHAT IT FOUND

Older women with locomotive syndrome had similar body composition to those without, but showed worse balance and slower walking.

Physical performance tests, not body scans, better identified those needing care.

Key findings

01No significant differences were found in age, height, weight, right-hand grip strength, or any body composition measures between the locomotive and non-locomotive groups.

02The non-locomotive group had significantly higher left-hand grip strength and longer one-legged standing times on both sides compared to the locomotive group.

03The locomotive group had significantly slower 5-meter comfortable walking times and longer Timed Up and Go (TUG) times, indicating poorer mobility performance.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only 36 participants, all female, which limits the generalizability of the findings to men or broader populations. The sample size is small, increasing the risk that the lack of difference in body composition is a false negative. The study was cross-sectional, so it cannot determine if poor function caused the syndrome or vice versa.

Declared interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume that normal body composition means an older woman is free from locomotive syndrome risk. This study found no difference in body composition between groups, but clear differences in functional performance.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →