PTCohortArchives of physiotherapy2021

Changes in physiotherapy students' beliefs and attitudes about low back pain through pre-registration training.

Guillaume Christe, Ben Darlow, Claude Pichonnaz

PMID 33993879

WHAT IT FOUND

Physiotherapy students’ unhelpful low back pain belief scores were 26.95 points lower after a biopsychosocial spinal pain module on a 34 to 170 scale, especially beliefs that the back is vulnerable and needs protection.

Key findings

01The pooled mean Back-PAQ score fell by 26.95 points after the spinal pain module across three cohorts, above the minimal detectable change of 14.5 points.

02The largest item-level changes were in beliefs that the back is easy to injure and needs protection.

03Scores fell further between the end of the module and the end of third year in two cohorts, with a pooled mean change of -7.16 points.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

No control group was used, so the study cannot show that the module caused the belief changes rather than other factors. Students answered anonymously, so the researchers could not track the same individuals over time and used unpaired tests. Only the 2018 to 2020 cohort had data at all study time points, and the first-year and third-year comparisons were limited. The third-year module also included persistent pain content, so the long-term effect of the spinal pain module alone cannot be separated from later teaching. The outcome was self-reported belief, not clinical decision making or patient outcome. The 2020 module was online and lacked practical manual therapy and simulated-patient training, so online delivery cannot be compared fairly with face-to-face delivery. The students came from one Swiss pre-registration program, so the size and pattern of change may not apply elsewhere.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that this module improves patient care or that online teaching is better than face-to-face teaching. The study measured anonymous students’ self-reported beliefs, had no control group, and the design did not allow a comparison between online and face-to-face modules.

Read it on PubMed →