PTOTCase ReportFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Case Report: Application of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in medial epicondylitis with concomitant ulnar nerve instability: a case series with long-term follow-up.

Larisa Ryskalin, Federica Fulceri, Francesco Busoni and 3 others

PMID 41847568

WHAT IT FOUND

Two of three patients reported large pain reductions and regained function after shockwave therapy for medial elbow tendinopathy with ulnar nerve instability.

One patient saw no change. No complications occurred. These cases suggest potential benefit but do not prove efficacy.

Key findings

01Two patients experienced noticeable pain reduction at two months and long-term follow-up, with one becoming pain-free.

02One patient showed no improvement in pain, disability, or nerve symptoms at any follow-up point.

03No treatment-related complications or side effects were reported in any patient.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only three patients, making it impossible to generalize findings or determine which patient characteristics predict success. The design was retrospective with no control group, so improvements cannot be attributed solely to ESWT rather than natural history or other factors. One patient dropped out early due to lack of benefit, which complicates the interpretation of overall efficacy.

Declared interests

The research was funded by the University of Pisa. No commercial conflicts of interest were declared.

The easy way to misread this

Do not assume ESWT will work for all patients with this condition. One patient had no response at all, and the small sample size means we cannot identify who will benefit. Treat this as preliminary evidence requiring careful patient selection and monitoring.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →