RNOtherRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2020

Care recommendations for parturient and postpartum women and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

Victor Hugo Alves Mascarenhas, Adriana Caroci-Becker, Kelly Cristina Máxima Pereira Venâncio and 3 others

PMID 32785566

WHAT IT FOUND

Early pandemic recommendations for labour, postpartum and newborn care in suspected or confirmed coronavirus infection favoured routine obstetric decisions, masks and hand hygiene, breastfeeding with precautions, and careful monitoring.

It mapped expert recommendations, not tested interventions.

Key findings

01The review included 19 papers, all dated 2020, and most were conducted in China (n=13).

02The included papers were six retrospective descriptive studies, five reviews, four opinion papers, three case studies, and one experience report.

03The mapped recommendations covered childbirth care and postpartum care, including breastfeeding, newborn care, hospital discharge, and home care.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review did not formally assess the methodological quality of included papers. Most included papers came from China, and many were retrospective studies, reviews, opinion papers, case studies, or experience reports. The search was limited to English, Spanish, and Portuguese, so work published in other languages may have been missed. Some practices remained unresolved, including directed pushing, instrumental delivery, delayed umbilical cord clamping, and immediate newborn bathing. The recommendations were mapped during an evolving pandemic and were expected to change as new evidence emerged.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read this as evidence that any recommended practice improves outcomes. It is a scoping review of early recommendations, and the included papers were not controlled trials, so the review maps what was suggested rather than proving what works.

Read it on PubMed →