Cardiopulmonary resuscitation for lay people: Evaluation of videos from the perspective of digital health literacy.
Sara Rodrigues Vilela, Jacqueline Andréia Bernardes Leão-Cordeiro, Katarinne Lima Moraes and 3 others
PMID 35858005WHAT IT FOUND
In 121 Portuguese YouTube CPR videos for lay people, no video met all 16 American Heart Association items, and many omitted authorship or references.
Do not recommend these videos for lay CPR education; use guideline-based materials.
Key findings
01No video met all 16 items on the CPR checklist.
02Only 7.4% of videos gave guidance on minimizing interruptions in chest compressions, and 17.4% gave guidance on requesting an AED.
03Only 7.4% cited main references and 6.6% provided sources in the video description.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The checklists were developed by the authors and reviewed by experts, but the paper states there were no validated instruments for evaluating digital health literacy in educational videos. The analysis included only Portuguese-language YouTube videos lasting no more than 4 minutes, so it does not describe longer videos, other languages, or other platforms. It excluded 160 infant CPR videos and 52 child CPR videos, so it says nothing about videos for children or infants. The study scored video content only. It did not test whether lay people understood the videos, performed CPR correctly, or whether patients survived. The correlation between better production quality and better CPR content does not show that better production caused correct CPR content. Many videos did not identify the author as a health professional or student, so the expertise of the producers could not be confirmed.
Declared interests
The article reports financing in part by CAPES in Brazil (Finance Code 001, grant # 88887.474410/2020-00). No other conflict-of-interest statement is given in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that popular YouTube CPR videos are reliable enough for lay learning. No video met all 16 guideline items, and the study did not test whether viewers performed CPR correctly.