Building post-primary school teachers' capacity to support student organisational skill difficulties: A collaborative occupational therapy and education intervention.
Shóna O'Donnell, Áine O'Dea, Deirdre O'Connor and 2 others
PMID 42079350WHAT IT FOUND
Teachers said the training changed what they do: they build organisation time into lessons, colour-code materials and ask what is behind a student's disorganisation rather than give out about it.
Timetable, attendance and COVID rules got in the way. No student outcomes were measured.
Key findings
01Teachers saw organisational difficulties as damaging students' well-being, motivation, access to the curriculum, inclusion and engagement in school life, not just their schoolwork; all 13 who completed the first survey said so.
02After the training, teachers changed their everyday teaching: adding time in lessons for students to get organised and using colour coding, visual prompts and written reminders. 11 teachers named colour coding as particularly helpful.
03Teachers ran the same programme at three levels of support, 7 one to one, 14 with small groups and 13 with whole classes, and adapted the content and timings to their own school and students.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for OTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Small convenience sample of 21 teachers who had volunteered for the training, so they were likely already interested in the programme. The authors say this limits how far the findings generalise. Response rates fell across the three surveys, so different numbers of teachers answered each one and the themes rest on different people at different timepoints. No student outcomes were measured at all, so nothing here shows the programme improved students' organisation or their participation in school. The surveys were written for this study and were not piloted before use. Data were collected during COVID-19, when school routines had changed and some lessons could not be delivered as written, and only online surveys were used, so there were no interviews to probe the answers.
Declared interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. The Getting It Together programme was developed by occupational therapists in the Occupational Therapy Support Service for Schools Project at the University of Limerick, and that project is funded by the National Council for Special Education, the same agency that ran the training.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read this as evidence that the Getting It Together programme improves students' organisation or school participation. The study asked teachers what they thought and what they did; no student outcomes were measured, and the teachers had volunteered for the training.
Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →