RNSurveyRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2017

Breastfeeding: what changed after a decade?1.

Áurea Tamami Minagawa Toryiama, Elizabeth Fujimori, Claudia Nery Teixeira Palombo and 3 others

PMID 29091126

WHAT IT FOUND

Exclusive breastfeeding under six months reached 46.1% in 2013, up from 13% in 2001; median breastfeeding duration reached 12 months, up from 7.2 months.

Pacifier use and first-born infants were associated with earlier weaning; breastfeeding support actions were not associated.

Key findings

01Exclusive breastfeeding prevalence in 2013 was 58.6% for children under four months and 46.1% for children under six months, after significant increases from 2001.

02Median breastfeeding duration increased from 7.2 months in 2001 to 12 months in 2013, an increase of 4.8 months; exclusive breastfeeding duration increased from 28 days to four months.

03Pacifier use and first-born infants remained associated with earlier weaning, while breastfeeding promotion actions were not statistically associated with weaning.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The 2013 study sampled children enrolled in primary health care facilities who attended with their mothers, while the 2001 study was population-based, so the two samples were not the same kind of group. The analysis compared 302 children under two years of age in 2013 with 261 children under two years of age in 2001, so children aged two to three years in the 2013 sample were not included in this comparison. Several breastfeeding promotion actions were measured only in 2013, not in 2001, so the study could not compare how those actions changed over the decade. The study measured whether breastfeeding support actions occurred, not their quality or how they were delivered, so it cannot tell whether the content of the actions was adequate. Because this was an observational comparison of two cross-sectional surveys, it cannot show that public policies, counselling, pacifier reduction, or any other factor caused the changes in breastfeeding. Breastfeeding status and exposure information came from interviews with mothers, so the estimates depend on maternal report at the time of the interview.

Declared interests

The work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil. The supplied text reports no competing interests.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read the rise in breastfeeding as proof that the recorded promotion actions worked. In the adjusted analysis, those actions were not statistically associated with weaning, and the study compared two different cross-sectional samples, so it cannot show cause.

Read it on PubMed →