BPACE: A Bayesian, Patient-Centered Procedure for Matrix Speech Tests in Noise.
Christoph Schmid, Wilhelm Wimmer, Martin Kompis
PMID 37501653WHAT IT FOUND
A new test procedure cut the time to get a reliable hearing threshold in noise from 4.6 to 3.1 minutes and made patients rate the listening effort as much easier.
The threshold results matched the standard test closely, so it is a valid, kinder alternative.
Key findings
01The new procedure gave speech-in-noise thresholds that agreed with the standard staircase method, with no significant difference between the two.
02Patients rated the listening effort for the new procedure significantly lower than for the standard test, even though the overall accuracy was only moderately higher.
03Terminating the test once the result became reliable shortened the average testing time by 1.3 minutes, though this benefit was smaller for patients with cochlear implants.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The study only tested normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users, so it does not show how the method performs for hearing aid users or other clinical groups. The time saving was much smaller for implant users, because their results took more sentences to become reliable. The new method is less accurate at estimating the steepness of the hearing curve, because it prioritises finding the threshold over measuring the slope. The test was not fully blinded, as participants could hear that the noise level was changing, which may have influenced their effort ratings. The study used German sentences, so the thresholds reported may not apply directly to other languages.
Declared interests
The authors declared no commercial or financial conflicts of interest. The study was funded by the scientific fund of the ENT clinic at Inselspital Bern, and open access funding came from the University of Bern.
The easy way to misread this
Do not assume the new test will always be quicker for every patient. The time saving depends on how consistent the listener's responses are, and patients with cochlear implants often need the full 30 sentences to get a reliable result, so they may not benefit from the early termination.