RNOtherRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2017

Birth plan compliance and its relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Pedro Hidalgo-Lopezosa, María Hidalgo-Maestre, Maria Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego

PMID 29236838

WHAT IT FOUND

Among 178 women with birth plans, higher compliance was associated with lower cesarean proportion and better umbilical cord pH and 1-minute Apgar scores; 5-minute Apgar did not differ.

Only 7.9% had all preferences met.

Key findings

01Most birth plans were only partly fulfilled: 7.9% were fully met and 3.4% were met in none of the points.

02When compliance was 50% or less, 18.8% had cesarean delivery; when compliance was 75% or higher, 6.1% had cesarean delivery.

03Newborns of mothers with high compliance had better umbilical cord pH and 1-minute Apgar scores than those with low compliance, while 5-minute Apgar scores did not differ.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study included only women who had presented a birth plan, so it cannot compare them with women who did not present one. It was retrospective and cross-sectional, and it excluded scheduled and urgent cesarean sections without labor, so it does not describe all births. The birth plans varied, including institutional forms and women's own manuscripts, and caregivers varied, which may affect how requests were recorded and met. Because the study was retrospective and cross-sectional, it can show association but not cause.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that writing or enforcing a birth plan causes fewer cesareans or healthier babies. The study only compared women who already had birth plans and grouped them by how much of the plan was met; it had no group without a birth plan, so the association may reflect other differences between women or care settings.

Read it on PubMed →