PTOTOtherJournal of rehabilitation medicine2024

Biopsychosocial rehabilitation in the working population with chronic low back pain: a concept analysis.

Dries Ceulemans, Maarten Moens, Michiel Reneman and 7 others

PMID 38226563

WHAT IT FOUND

A biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme for working adults with chronic low back pain requires 11 key components.

These include therapeutic exercise, psychological support, education, personalization, self-management, participation, follow-up, practice standards, goal-setting, social support, and dietary advice.

Key findings

01The concept analysis identified 11 attributes of a biopsychosocial rehabilitation programme for chronic low back pain in the working population.

02Therapeutic exercise was the most frequently identified attribute, appearing in 40 of the 42 included references.

03Social support and dietary advice were the least common attributes, appearing in only 12 and 4 references respectively.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTsWhat it means for OTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study did not perform a risk of bias or quality assessment of the included references, which limits the certainty of the evidence base. The search was limited to literature from 2010 onwards, potentially missing older, high-quality evidence. The concept analysis focuses on defining components, not evaluating their effectiveness. It does not prove that programmes containing these attributes work better. Spiritual care was excluded due to a lack of evidence, which may be a relevant dimension for some patients.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Lisa Goudman is funded by the Research Foundation Flanders.

The easy way to misread this

Do not interpret this paper as evidence that a biopsychosocial programme works. This is a concept analysis defining what such a programme should contain, not a clinical trial testing its effectiveness. The presence of these attributes does not guarantee better outcomes.

Read it on PubMed →