Biobehavioral Intervention Targeting Physical Activity Behavior Change for Older Veterans after Nontraumatic Amputation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cory L Christiansen, Matthew J Miller, Paul W Kline and 4 others
PMID 32248638WHAT IT FOUND
A 12-week telehealth step-focused program did not increase daily steps or improve reported life participation in veterans with lower-limb loss, although it was safe and acceptable.
Key findings
01The program was feasible and safe: retention was 90% during the intervention period, the first intervention group's interest and enjoyment score was 5.8, above the 5.0 cutoff, and adverse events did not differ between groups.
02Only 10% of participants reached the dose goal of a 3% average weekly step increase.
03The intervention did not increase average daily steps or improve disability scores: step-count change had an effect size of -0.15, and there were no between-group differences in step count or disability scores.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only men were successfully recruited, so the results do not describe women veterans. The study was small, with 31 enrolled and 28 completing the 12-week test, and it was not powered for demographic comparisons. Participants had to be ambulatory with a prosthesis, live within 50 miles, and have no unstable heart condition, uncontrolled hypertension, acute systemic infection, recent stroke within 2 years, active cancer treatment, or lower-extremity wound or ulcer that limited walking, so results do not apply to nonambulatory patients or those with these conditions. The participants were 1 to 5 years after amputation, so the trial does not show what happens in the first 6 months. Blinding was limited to outcome assessors. The intervention combined FitBit feedback, tablet training, weekly video coaching, education, self-monitoring, tailored feedback, barrier and facilitator identification, problem solving, action planning, and encouragement, so the contribution of any single component cannot be separated. The attention control was not inert; it included health education and seated range-of-motion tasks. Retention was 90%, but its confidence interval included the 85% cutoff, so feasibility was not firmly established. Dose goal attainment was only 10%, so the planned weekly step increase was rarely achieved.
Declared interests
The supplied text does not include an author conflict-of-interest or funding declaration. The listed publication types indicate research support from NIH extramural and U.S. Government non-P.H.S. sources.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the acceptable retention and enjoyment as proof that the program increases activity. The main activity outcome showed no between-group difference, and only 10% of participants reached the 3% weekly step-increase target.