OtherJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Baseline EMG alters muscle synergy activations while preserving spatial structure in healthy and post-stroke subjects.

Kunkun Zhao, Yizhou Feng, Yaowei Jin and 4 others

PMID 41545900

WHAT IT FOUND

Adding baseline EMG kept healthy synergy count similar, but stroke subjects had fewer synergies without baseline, and longer padding changed activation timing.

Key findings

01Healthy subjects showed similar synergy counts with all EMG and with movement-only EMG: 3.67 ± 0.985 versus 3.08 ± 0.669.

02In the nine analysed stroke subjects, movement-only EMG required fewer synergies than all EMG: 1.89 ± 0.782 versus 3.11 ± 0.601.

03Longer baseline padding moved synergy activation onset earlier and offset later, and a similarity score for the timing shape was below 0.15.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The study analysed a small public dataset of twelve healthy and ten stroke subjects, and the stroke padding analysis included only nine subjects because some lacked enough baseline time. It tested EMG processing choices, not a therapy, recovery, or patient outcome. Movement onset and offset were defined by an EMG threshold, and kinematic data were unavailable, so the source of baseline activity was uncertain. Only non-negative matrix factorization was used, so other decomposition methods could change the number or structure of synergies. The paper had no ground truth for true CNS synergies, so changes in synergy count or merging cannot be read as direct neural changes. Stroke results were based on upper-limb reaching only and may not apply to walking, hand function, or other tasks.

Declared interests

Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, and the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program. No other conflict statement is provided in the supplied text.

The easy way to misread this

Do not read a change in synergy count as proof that baseline EMG reveals a new motor module or that stroke recovery can be measured this way. The study tested EMG processing choices, not patient outcomes, and the extra baseline patterns were combinations of existing patterns.

Summarised by AI from the full paper, without a clinician reviewing it. Check it against the source before it changes what you do. Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
twelve healthy individuals and ten stroke subjects; nine stroke subjects were analysed in the padding length comparison
Certainty of evidence
Low

Browse

    Cite

    Kunkun Zhao, Yizhou Feng, Yaowei Jin, et al. Baseline EMG alters muscle synergy activations while preserving spatial structure in healthy and post-stroke subjects. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2026.

    Read the original — we summarise, we never replace the paper.