Autonomic Nervous System Function After a Skin-to-Skin Contact Intervention in Infants With Congenital Heart Disease.
Tondi M Harrison, Roger Brown
PMID 28181926WHAT IT FOUND
The main heart-rhythm measure did not change over time after 14 days of skin-to-skin contact in 10 infants with congenital heart disease.
No adverse events occurred, and mothers found it acceptable.
Key findings
01The analysed results reflect 10 infants and their mothers after a 14-day skin-to-skin intervention, and no adverse events related to the intervention occurred.
02The primary non-linear heart-rhythm measure, SD12, did not change significantly over time before feeding.
03Abnormal Poincaré plots were observed in all 10 infants, and 9 of 10 demonstrated both torpedo- and complex-type patterns.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The analysed sample was only 10 infants, so the study cannot show whether skin-to-skin contact changed autonomic function. There was no control group, so changes over time could reflect maturation, recovery from surgery, feeding, medications, or other hospital experiences. The study used a convenience sample from 2 hospitals and excluded infants with non-cardiac congenital defects or syndromes, exclusive nasogastric feedings after surgery, or ongoing cardiac pacing, so results may not apply to more complex or unstable infants. Attrition was substantial: 2 infants died before the intervention, 2 were too sick to complete it, and 4 families withdrew after discharge. The significance threshold was set at 0.1 because the study was exploratory, so apparent effects are less certain. No staff nurses completed the planned interviews, so the effect on nursing workflow was not formally measured.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that skin-to-skin contact improved autonomic function or reduced risk. The primary non-linear measure did not change, only 10 infants were analysed, and there was no comparison group.