Autism ableism seen through research abstract contents: A mixed-methods analysis of language in NIH-funded genetic and genomic autism research.

The sample size of 166 projects was relatively small, preventing detailed comparisons over time or across specific research specialties. The study only included successfully funded NIH projects in the US, excluding unsuccessful applications, non-US research, and privately funded work. The codebook used was originally designed as a guide for researchers, not as a validated research instrument. The analysis focused on identifying ableist language and did not systematically record or analyze inclusive or neuro-affirming language, though the coders noted it was rare. The reliance on abstracts and grant documentation means the findings reflect how researchers sell their work, which may not fully represent their personal beliefs or clinical practices.

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest. The work was supported by the NIH Intramural Research Program.

Do not interpret this as a critique of clinical therapists or direct patient care. The study analyzes grant applications and research abstracts, which are written to secure funding and may use persuasive or "hyped" language that does not reflect the actual values or practices of the researchers in the clinic.