Auditory feedback control in adults who stutter during metronome-paced speech II. Formant Perturbation.
Saul A Frankford, Shanqing Cai, Alfonso Nieto-Castañón and 1 others
PMID 36063640WHAT IT FOUND
Metronome pacing changed how adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter responded to shifted vowel feedback.
Adults who stutter responded when paced, while adults who do not stutter did not. They also produced fewer disfluencies in paced speech.
Key findings
01Adults who stutter produced fewer disfluencies during metronome-paced speech (1.2% of trials) than during normal speech (7.4% of trials).
02During normal speech, adults who do not stutter changed their vowel formants in the opposite direction of the shifted feedback, while adults who stutter did not; during metronome-paced speech, that pattern reversed.
03Both groups spoke more slowly when metronome-paced, but the slower speech was not related to the reduction in disfluencies.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for SLPs
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
Only 31 adults participated, and the study used one target sentence plus filler sentences, so it may not reflect everyday speech. The stuttering group included adults only, and the authors note that results may reflect long-standing adaptive behaviours rather than core stuttering mechanisms. Trials with unambiguous stutters were removed from the perturbation analysis, and the overall stutter rate was low, so the feedback responses were measured in relatively fluent speech. The earphone feedback had a delay of 24 to 32 ms, and delayed auditory feedback itself can improve fluency, so the metronome effect may be partly a feedback delay effect. There was a latency difference between perturbed trials (24 ms) and unperturbed trials (32 ms), although the authors say it was consistent across groups and speaking conditions. The formant response was not a simple main effect of pacing or group; only an interaction was significant, and exploratory timepoint tests were uncorrected. One participant completed 200 trials instead of 240 because of a technical error. One adult who stutter had a severity score below the manual threshold but was included because they identified as a person who stutters.
Declared interests
All authors declare no competing interests. The article is listed as supported by N.I.H. Extramural research support.
The easy way to misread this
Do not conclude that metronome pacing is an effective stuttering therapy or that it fixes auditory feedback control. The study used one sentence with artificial formant shifts in a lab, and the response pattern was a group by condition interaction, not a straightforward improvement in adults who stutter.