PTCohortPhysical therapy2025

Association Between Physical Therapists' Attitudes and Beliefs and the Functional Outcomes of Patients With Low Back Pain: A Multilevel Analysis Study.

Yaniv Nudelman, Tamar Pincus, Noa Ben Ami

PMID 39834020

WHAT IT FOUND

Patient function was explained mainly by patient characteristics, not therapist attitudes.

A more biomedical attitude showed a small negative association, but it weakened after adjustment. Psychological orientation was not linked to better function.

Key findings

01The physical therapists explained a small share of outcome variance: 10% for discharge functional status scores and 4% for risk-adjusted residual scores.

02In the model that added each attitude scale separately, a more biomedical attitude had a small negative association with functional status (β = −.08, P = .008); after adjustment it was β = −.06, P = .06.

03Psychological orientation and the other attitude scales were not significantly associated with functional status or risk-adjusted residual scores.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for PTs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

It was an observational cohort study, so it cannot show that therapist attitudes caused better or worse patient function. The initial dataset had 17,859 episodes, and the final analysis used 1043 patients; many patients were excluded because they did not complete discharge assessments. Excluded patients had more chronic symptoms and lower predicted functional change, and the final patient sample had better baseline function and pain than the excluded patients. Only 68 physical therapists were in the final analysis, although 540 were employed and 353 participated in the initial survey, and the final therapist sample differed slightly in age from excluded therapists (mean difference = 0.6 year, P = .045). The study was done in one public health care organization in Israel, so findings may not apply to other health care settings. Most physical therapists in the sensitivity analysis did not complete the second attitude survey, so changes in attitudes over time were not fully assessed. The attitude questionnaire may not capture the complexity of clinician attitudes, and workload or organizational factors may weaken the link between attitudes and practice.

Declared interests

The study was funded by the D.L. Hart Memorial Outcomes Research Grant provided by Focus On Therapeutic Outcomes, Inc. The funders played no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of the study. The data system used a customized version of the Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes software.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that changing physical therapists' attitudes will improve patient function. The study was observational, and the biomedical attitude association was small and became weaker after adjustment.

Read it on PubMed →