Assistive Relief Tool for Early Childhood and Special Psychological Symptom Groups during the Pandemic: Clothing Design Based on the Virtual Contact Principle.
Yunjuan Liu, Yan Wang, Meiyan Liu
PMID 35655947WHAT IT FOUND
A retracted clothing design report describes airbag clothing meant to simulate hugging.
Wearing trials and interviews reported comfort and perceived hug, but the paper does not show the garment helps depression, autism, or online education.
Key findings
0146.6% of questionnaire respondents chose face-to-face waist hugging as the most comfortable position, and warmth and comfort were the main reported hugging feelings.
02Pressure tests on hugging pairs found arm contact pressure higher than other areas, and the design target set pressure above 1 kPa.
03Wear evaluation reported participants felt pressure, felt hugged and felt relaxed, while also noting slow pressure adjustment and a small contact area.
STILL TO COME
How it was doneWhat they found
Read the rest of this summary
You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.
What it does not show
The supplied text identifies the article as a retracted publication. The evaluations rely on subjective reports, interviews and prototype testing, not measured clinical or educational outcomes. The report does not show that the clothing reduces depression, improves autism-related function, or improves online education. The online education feedback involved pressure clothing together with psychologist assessment and instructional activities, so the contribution of the clothing alone cannot be separated. The supplied text does not give a clear funding or conflict of interest statement.
Declared interests
No funding or conflict of interest declaration appears in the supplied text.
The easy way to misread this
Do not read the positive feedback as evidence that the clothing treats depression, autism, or educational isolation. It is a retracted prototype report with subjective wearing evaluations and no controlled clinical outcome.