RNOtherInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Are EDs the Only Option? Hospital-Based Alternatives to the Emergency Department for Mental Health Crises: A Scoping Review.

Carly Hudson, Candice Bowman, Marcus Randall

PMID 40390281

WHAT IT FOUND

Hospital-based alternatives to emergency departments for mental health crises include short observation units, psychiatric emergency services, peer-led safe havens, and specialised programmes.

Evaluations report patient satisfaction and some reduced ED use, but the review cannot prove these services work better than standard care.

Key findings

01The review included 17 sources relating to in- or near-hospital crisis care services.

02Eight sources described psychiatric emergency services, six described crisis stabilisation or observation units, two described specialised services for specific populations, and one described a non-clinical crisis service.

03Evaluations of crisis stabilisation units reported that 1.9% to 3% of patients returned within 72 hours and 60% to 70% were diverted from inpatient services.

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they foundWhat it means for RNs

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

This is a scoping review, not a controlled comparison of crisis services with emergency departments, so it cannot show that any service works better. The included sources varied in design and nature, and service descriptions were inconsistent. Only some services had evaluations, and those evaluations used different methods and outcomes, so comparison is difficult. Several important domains were least evaluated, including involuntary holds, restraint use, staff workload, capacity and cost. Some services were used beyond their intended purpose, such as managing acute ward overcrowding or admitting adolescents outside guidelines. It is likely additional crisis services exist but were not described sufficiently to be included.

Declared interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that hospital-based alternatives are proven better than emergency departments. The review summarised descriptive service reports and heterogeneous evaluations, not controlled comparisons, and the authors state that current evidence is fragmented and insufficient to establish effectiveness.

Read it on PubMed →