Meta-AnalysisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Application of oscillating field stimulation in the treatment of spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.

Guanlong Wang, Luchun Xu, Jiaojiao Fan and 6 others

PMID 40247270

WHAT IT FOUND

In rats with spinal cord injury, oscillating field stimulation did not improve walking scores at 2 weeks.

It improved scores at 4 and 8 weeks, and motor function test results.

Key findings

01At 2 weeks after rat spinal cord injury, oscillating field stimulation did not significantly improve BBB locomotor scores (mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.48, P = 0.89).

02At 4 weeks and 8 weeks, BBB locomotor scores were significantly higher with oscillating field stimulation (mean differences 2.87 and 3.00).

03Motor evoked potential latency was significantly lower with oscillating field stimulation (mean difference -2.09, 95% CI -2.70 to -1.47).

STILL TO COME

How it was doneWhat they found

Read the rest of this summary

You get three full summaries a month, free, and we do not ask for a card. Search, the TL;DRs and your library stay unlimited either way.

Already have one?

What it does not show

The review included only rat spinal cord injury studies, not human patients. The included studies had unclear risk of bias for randomization method, allocation concealment, blinded intervention, and blinded outcome assessment. Three studies did not clarify whether there was data loss. The pooled motor function results had high heterogeneity across studies. The 6-week BBB result depended on one study, because excluding Tian 2016 made the result non-significant. The motor evoked potential analysis combined studies measured at different time points, which increased heterogeneity. Histological outcomes could not be pooled because staining and measurement methods varied. Only English-language studies were included. The review excluded clinical studies.

Declared interests

The paper states that funding came from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. No other conflict of interest statement is provided.

The easy way to misread this

Do not conclude that oscillating field stimulation is proven to improve human spinal cord injury. The review included only rat studies, and the included studies had unclear randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment.

Read it on PubMed →


The study

Participants
8 included animal studies; sample sizes ranged from 14 to 180 animals
Certainty of evidence
Moderate

Browse

    Cite

    Guanlong Wang, Luchun Xu, Jiaojiao Fan, et al. Application of oscillating field stimulation in the treatment of spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2025.

    Read the original